|
|
Post by shoreman on Apr 27, 2006 3:17:46 GMT -5
YARMOUTH, Massachusetts (Reuters) - A plan to build the world largest offshore wind-power farm off Massachusetts is dividing residents of the Cape Cod resort region, in a debate involving million-dollar ocean views, migrating birds and soaring energy bills. Opponents seeking to block the $900 million project include Democratic Sen. Ted Kennedy, whose family's Hyannisport compound is in sight of it. Kennedy's brother, former president John F. Kennedy, created the Cape Cod National Seashore in 1961. Cape Cod debates first US offshore wind farm |
|
|
|
Post by freedomrules3 on Apr 27, 2006 22:17:02 GMT -5
i got an error page . i cant imagine someone being against this. how noticable are windmills offshore? how many miles offshore are they and will they even be able to be seen i wonder.i'd like to fill my yard with windmills and make the electric company pay me  . |
|
|
|
Post by shoreman on Apr 27, 2006 22:28:06 GMT -5
Cape Cod debates first U.S. offshore wind farm
Wed Apr 26, 2006 4:10 PM ET
By Jason Szep
YARMOUTH, Massachusetts (Reuters) - A plan to build the world's largest offshore wind-power farm off Massachusetts is dividing residents of the Cape Cod resort region, in a debate involving million-dollar ocean views, migrating birds and soaring energy bills.
Opponents seeking to block the $900 million project include Democratic Sen. Ted Kennedy, whose family's Hyannisport compound is in sight of it. Kennedy's brother, former president John F. Kennedy, created the Cape Cod National Seashore in 1961.
After several years of intense lobbying on both sides, many Cape Cod residents are deeply divided as Congress approaches a vote as early as next week that could effectively block the what would be the first U.S. offshore wind farm.
"Lots of people around here are against it. Some worry about the view. But if it will bring down my electric bill, I'm for it," said Mort Handler, an 81-year-old real estate agent with Cape Realty in Yarmouth, a port town of 21,174 people.
The plan calls for 130 wind turbines spread over 24 square miles -- about the size of a small town -- 6 miles off the coast. Each turbine tower would rise 247 feet out of the water, almost as much as the Statue of Liberty's 305 feet.
At its peak, the privately funded Cape Wind Associates LLC project would generate more than 400 megawatts of electricity, enough to meet the needs of some 400,000 homes, or about 75 percent of Cape Cod and the islands.
Backers say the wind farm would save millions of dollars in energy costs and help the United States wean itself off foreign oil at a time of record-high crude prices, in a region where fuel bills have doubled in 5 years.
But opponents say the turbines' big steel blades could kill migrating birds and the sight of them could threaten the lucrative tourist industry.
Cape Cod and its nearby islands of Nantucket and Martha's Vineyard are famous for mansions, scenic beaches, hot summers, bitterly cold winters and a centuries-old fishing industry.
The wind farm would take advantage of the region's strong winds, shallow depth and historically small storm waves.
"You get people split exactly in the middle here," said Christine Ross, executive director of the Chamber of Commerce in the town of Falmouth.
"There are people out there who think cynically that the last place that power is going to land is on Cape Cod. They are also concerned about safety and the visible detraction. Then there are people who see renewable energy as a fabulous thing."
ENVIRONMENTAL WORRIES
A poll by the University of Delaware released this week shows a tilt on Cape Cod against the project with about 55.5 percent of 500 respondents in the Cape Cod area opposed and 43.8 percent supporting it.
"We asked why they were against it and most of the reasons were not factually supported," said Willett Kempton, a University of Delaware associate professor of marine policy.
"They expected there would be a substantial environmental impact and a very negative impact on sea creatures and wildlife," he said. "But when it's in place, there is very little if any negative impact under water."
Marine life would grow around the turbines' foundations, Kempton said. "It's probably overall a positive impact."
A U.S. Army Corps of Engineers study estimates the blades would kill about 360 birds would be killed yearly. "When you compare that to wildlife damage from burning the equivalent amount of fossil fuels, it's far less," he said.
Audra Parker of the Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound said the turbines would hurt tourism, views and property values and complicate air and sea navigation.
Mark Rodgers of Cape Wind says the turbines would be spaced a third of a mile (km) apart to make them safe for navigation.
He said the project would generate $25 million in annual energy savings. Denmark's offshore wind farms, similar to Cape Wind's proposal, have had little effect on property values, he added. The turbines would appear as specks from the shoreline, he said.
An unusual alliance has formed to block the project in Congress, including Kennedy and two Alaska Republicans.
The blocking provisions would give Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, a likely Republican candidate for the White House who strongly opposes the project, veto power over the wind farm.
Future offshore wind projects are likely to go ahead even if Cape Wind fails, said Paul Flemming, analyst at Energy Security Analysis Inc.
More than 2,400 megawatts of wind energy production -- enough to power about 650,000 homes -- was added to the U.S. power grid in 2005. "In the high-gas price environment it is becoming especially viable," he said.
|
|
|
|
Post by ncboman on Apr 27, 2006 22:56:30 GMT -5
900 mill before cost overruns just sittin out there in the Atlantic. When oil hits $5000 a barrel, it might be feasible for short term only.  |
|
|
|
Post by Rock Chuck on May 5, 2006 21:22:44 GMT -5
This is private enterprise. More power to them in my opinion.
Kennedy has been screaming for years that we need to develop alternate energy sources. Do you think he'd try to block a windmill within sight of your house just because you didn't want to see it? This shows everyone exactly what kind of hypocrit he really is.
Dick
|
|
|
|
Post by freedomrules3 on May 5, 2006 21:32:20 GMT -5
Dick , the REAL hypocrites are the fools who re-elect this jerk and others year after year. term limits anyone rethinking maybe they should just hook up old teds mouth to a windmill, just think how much power would be created from all his hot air ;D |
|
|
|
Post by shoreman on May 11, 2006 9:40:03 GMT -5
This is private enterprise. More power to them in my opinion. Kennedy has been screaming for years that we need to develop alternate energy sources. Do you think he'd try to block a windmill within sight of your house just because you didn't want to see it? This shows everyone exactly what kind of hypocrit he really is. Dick Quite right, Dick. They want wind farms and alternative fuels as long as they're not directly afffected by it. Put it in their picture-perfect neck of the wooods -- it's time for NIMBY. www.ucomics.com/danwasserman/2006/04/27/ |
|
.
